Connect with us


What happened to Mike Cernovich?



We wanted to release Hoaxed in May.

That’s not going to happen as we took the film in a different direction. In hindsight, Hoaxed should have been a six-part series.

The beauty and frustration (oh, mindset, we mean challenge!) of making documentary films is that you don’t know where the project will head. There isn’t a script. You have an idea of what the film will be, and then you go into production. Films make you as much as you make them.

We are releasing Hoaxed as a film because films have cachet. Although I write about the dangers of buying into social status, you must also know the rules of the social status game. Film is more powerful than mini-series.

We’ll be having a private screening for Hoaxed in June, and are planning a public release for July.

A Night for Freedom is coming soon.

We held two major events – one in New York and another in D.C. – called A Night for Freedom.

For the New York event, we had two venues flake on us, and yet still pulled off an incredible event.

Chelsea Manning showed up, which freaked out the left.

Events take a lot of time and energy to plan, and they are expensive. (The NYC event cost $110,000, and I lost a few grand on it, not including my travel costs.)

I’ll let you know when the next event is scheduled. There might be one happening as soon as June.

The Hoaxed screening takes priority over A Night for Freedom. We may be able to fold the premier into A Night for Freedom. We’ll see.

Audacity, my long-awaited book on How to Go from Nobody to Somebody is going to be released in 2018.

Why is Audacity a year late?

Audacity folds in my own personal experiences. By the time Audacity is released I’ll have:

  • Crowd-funded two major films,
  • Appeared on 60 Minutes before 15 million people,
  • Broke some of the biggest stories of the year,
  • Held massive events in the biggest cities,
  • Started a supplement company.
  • Etc.

I despise how-to books by people who rely on theory. I went from being some fat kid on food stamps to…this…whatever this is. And even people who hate me know my name.

Gorilla Mindset Master Class is coming soon.

A lot of people never understood why I went from living a great life with a no-stress mindset business to do media, which is terrible work, high stress, and pays poorly. What good is a mindset book that isn’t applied in the real world? I’ve done stuff that shouldn’t be possible.

I’ll be filming the class with a studio audience on May 12, 2018. From there we’ll go into post-production. Expect the course before August.

Gorilla Mindset Network.

I’m still working on this. As you can see, there’s a lot going on.

Gorilla Mind has released some great products.

Gorilla Mind is one year behind schedule, because the first supplier didn’t fulfill their obligations. Gorilla Mind found another (better) supplier, and independently lab tested all products.

Gorilla Mind currently offers a powerful focusing agent (one without caffeine).

And Gorilla Dream is by far the best sleep aid I’ve ever taken. Nothing comes close.

Gorilla Mind even offers a skin care serum.

P.S. It’s time for some real talk for the bottom 1%.

I am used to being hated by people for ideological reasons, but some of my own “readers” and “fans” have gotten nasty. Let me be clear about something.

Every day people love telling me what I should be doing. I’m in post-production on a film, writing a book, working on a video course, planning events, and breaking news. I don’t have a staff and work out of a spare bedroom.

Because a lot of people are political readers, they are used to being pandered to by people who need every vote. I don’t need every reader.

I don’t need more readers, I don’t need dead beat readers, and I don’t need complainers.

If you’re upset with me, don’t read. I don’t need to hear about it. I don’t need a “noisy unfollow.” Just go away.

Positive people only.

P.P.S. You are the best readers in the world.

People wonder who I deal with the hate and negativity, but that is only a small percentage of people.

It’s really astounding how generous and supportive you’ve been.

You’ve crowd-funded to films, bought my books, bought for friends, and even kicked in some cash and bitcoin to support our media work.

YOU are appreciated.

If you want to see the work continue, you can support the mission here.

Or Bitcoin – 359kBYon7doAgrs8VmnfWYWrNg2ByW72UM

And pick up a copy of Gorilla Mindset today.



The Patreon Lawsuit Involving Owen Benjamin Explained by a Lawyer



Patreon, a platform popular with podcasts, journalists, and comedian faces significant legal peril due a fascinating quirk of California law that no one seemed to have noticed.

  • Summary: Patreon banned Owen Benjamin. Owen Benjamin’s backers moved for arbitration, alleging various causes of action. Under the arbitration procedures spelled out in Patreon’s Terms of Service, Patreon must pay the filing fees, which could total millions of dollars. Patreon cannot collect those fees back, even if Patreon wins the arbitrations.

Tech companies face almost total protection from lawsuits due to a law created by Congress to encourage freedom of speech on the web. Because of this, companies have gotten sloppy with the Terms of Service.

Patreon’s Terms of Service, like nearly every other tech companies, provide that anyone who wants to use Patreon must do so in arbitration. Patreon’s TOS also ban class actions or any joint actions.

Patreon’s TOS mandate arbitration and ban class actions because individual consumers who suffer small harms aren’t able to find a lawyer to take their case. Again, all tech companies do this. Let’s not single out Patreon. Here is Amazon:

  • Any dispute or claim relating in any way to your use of any Amazon Service, or to any products or services sold or distributed by Amazon or through will be resolved by binding arbitration, rather than in court, except that you may assert claims in small claims court if your claims qualify.

Here is PayPal:

  • By opening and using a PayPal account, you agree to comply with all of the terms and conditions in this user agreement. The terms include an agreement to resolve disputes by arbitration on an individual basis.

Owen Benjamin Gets Banned. Dozens of his backers individual claims for arbitration.

Patreon, by banning a Creator, disrupts the economic relationship between Creator and Backer. In legal terms this is called tortious interference with a business relationship.

Patreon, under California law, must pay the arbitration fees in advance. These fees can be upward of $10,000 per case.

If dozens of backers move for individual arbitration against Patreon, you can start doing the math.

Benjamins’ Backers Put Patreon on Notice; Patreon Unilaterally Amends its TOS to Bar the Claims the Parties were Going to Bring.

In early December, numerous defendants told Patreon that they intended to move for individual arbitration.

Patreon’s TOS suggest that contacting them before seeking arbitration is required, although this provision could be read as a request rather than a demand.

  • We encourage you to contact us if you have an issue. If a dispute does arise out of these terms or related to your use of Patreon, and it cannot be resolved after you talk with us, then it must be resolved by arbitration.

Because Patreon wrote the TOS, the terms will be resolved against Patreon. In law this is known as contra proferentem. Any ambiguous language will be read in favor of the party who did not draft it.

The TOS, to me and many others, looks like a pre-filing demand. Others may claim the terms read otherwise. Contra proferentem applies.

Two or three weeks later, Patreon unilaterally altered the Terms of Service by adding this clause:

  • You may not bring a claim against us for suspending or terminating another person’s account, and you agree you will not bring such a claim. If you try to bring such a claim, you are responsible for the damages caused, including attorneys fees and costs. These terms remain in effect even if you no longer have an account.

Patreon claimed that its unilateral change to the TOS “remain in effect even if you no longer have an account.”

Yes, Patreon literally changed its TOS after it was contacted by arbitration claimants, who were required to contact Patreon before moving for arbitration.

Patreon filed a Mass Action against the Arbitration Claimants.

Patreon lost several procedural motions before arbitrations. After losing these motions, they sued the arbitration claimants in California State Court.

Realizing that the arbitration fees would be in the millions of dollars range, Patreon filed a group action against all 72 arbitration claimants. Patreon sought an injunction, that is, they want the Court to order the arbitrations to be stopped.

Here is what Patreon’s TOS says about group actions:

  • Arbitrations may only take place on an individual basis. No class arbitrations or other grouping of parties is allowed. By agreeing to these terms you are waiving your right to trial by jury or to participate in a class action or representative proceeding; we are also waiving these rights.

To drop my lawyer’s latin again, contra proferentem. Patreon can’t claim that when they said that “other groupings of parties is allowed,” applies only to arbitrations. That provision is subject to an ambiguous reading at best.

How can Patreon file a group action against 72 defendants when Patreon barred group actions? They can’t.

The Patreon Hearing.

The 72 defendants were represented by well-known First Amendment lawyer Marc Randazza.

The Court issued a tentative (not final) order denying the injunctions.

During the hearing, Patreon’s counsel brought up additional cases that it claimed applied to the lawsuit.

The Court suggested that Randazza file a supplemental motion addressing those new cases Patreon’s counsel cited.

Patreon will probably lose, and should lose, its State Court action.

Patreon’s TOS required parties to use arbitration. Group actions were banned. The parties complied with the TOS, first by putting Patreon on notice as to their claims.

Once the parties put Patreon on notice of their claim, Patreon was barred by well-established law from amending the TOS in a way that would foreclose those claims.

The Implications?

If a popular creator were banned from PayPal, could he or she have her backers move for arbitration as well?

That’s a specific question that many lawyers are looking at now.

Patreon, like Door Dash before it, banned class actions before decision that group actions are in fact an inefficient way of resolving cases.

Here is what a federal judge told one tech company who complained about a “loophole” being used by the parties:

DoorDash Ordered to Pay $9.5M to Arbitrate 5,000 Labor Disputes:

SAN FRANCISCO (CN) – Rejecting claims that the legal process it forced on workers is unfair, a federal judge Monday ordered food-delivery service DoorDash to pay $9.5 million in arbitration fees for 5,010 delivery drivers’ labor demands against the company.

“You’re going to pay that money,” U.S. District Judge William Alsup said in court. “You don’t want to pay millions of dollars, but that’s what you bargained to do and you’re going to do it.”

Of course anything can happen in a court of law, and the judge will be issuing a final ruling in a few weeks from now.

Read my prior coverage here:

Patreon Faces New Legal Peril Under California Law

Continue Reading


CNN’s Brian Stelter Apologizes for Mistake (Good Man)




CNN’s Brian Stelter falsely accused a woman of spreading disinformation tonight, in a Tweet Stelte deleted without apology after it was revealed that Stelter lying.

The lie concerned a fire started by rioters in Washington D.C. Katrina B. Haydon reported that St. John’s church near the White House was on fire.




Stelter attacked the woman, baselessly accusing her of lying.


Brian Stelter has yet to apologize to spreading disinformation.

Did Brian Stelter lie to protect violent protesters?

Why did Stelter lie?

Is he trying to provide propaganda for violent protesters and domestic terrorists?

Continue Reading


“Burn It Down,” ESPN Writer Encourages Arson of Low Income Housing



ESPN sportswriter Chris Palmer Martin Tweeted, “Burn that shit down. Burn it all down.” The burning building was a low-income housing area in Minneapolis. (Minneapolis vandalism targets include 189-unit affordable housing development.)

When rioters neared Martin’s home, he called them “animals.”


The media has a history of supporting ANTIFA.



Hoaxed Movie Uncovers the Media’s Relationship with ANTIFA

Watch the Hoaxed Movie Trailer

Where to Watch Hoaxed Movie

iTunes here

Vimeo here

YouTube here

VuDu here

DVDs here

Continue Reading


Read previous post:
Exodus Bitcoin Wallet Review

Exodus is a cryptocurrency wallet that operates like other software. It's user-friendly and gives people access to a wide variety...