Uncategorized

In a heated exchange with Congressman Matt Gaetz, Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman claimed that he was an “impeachment skeptic” until July 25, 2019.

You can watch the full exchange here, where Feldman clearly states under oath:

• “Until this call on July 25th [2019], I was an impeachment skeptic.”

"Until this call on July 25th I was an 'impeachment skeptic.' The call changed my mind sir, and for good reason."

— Prof. Noah Feldman to Rep. Matt Gaetz #ImpeachmentPBS pic.twitter.com/AL4LBQ63wE

— PBS NewsHour (@NewsHour) December 4, 2019

Noah Feldman’s own words contradict his testimony.

In a May 17, 2017 story in Vice about the Comey firing, Professor Feldman said:

What the president did is an outrage. It’s impeachable, and obstruction of justice in the sense of being a “high crime and misdemeanor.” But it’s almost certainly not a crime of obstruction of justice.

When pressed to provide more nuance about impeachment, Professor Feldman said:

So just to clarify, this looks like obstruction of justice in the high crimes and misdemeanors sense but not in the Jeff Sessions–led Justice Department will do anything about it sense? Correct. And frankly, breaking the norm of politicizing law enforcement—it’s a great basis for impeachment. It’s not a crime, and in fact it’s in the president’s constitutional authority, but it’s still impeachable. That’s the whole point—the president can do things within his legal constitutional authority where the only sanction available under our system is impeachment.

Feldman doesn’t qualify his statement. He doesn’t express skepticism or doubt. He is clear with his words: “What the president did is an outrage. It’s impeachable.”

Feldman also suggested in other articles that garden variety political bluster could lead to Trump’s impeachment

Donald Trump’s Obama wiretapping claims could get him impeached, says Harvard law professor

Donald Trump’s claims that Barack Obama ordered a wiretap of his phones during the presidential campaign could lead to the Republican being impeached, a leading US law professor has said. Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard Law School, said the unsubstantiated claims, if proved false, could be a “major scandal” that “could get the current president impeached”.

In the above article Feldman qualifies his statements a bit:

And accusing the past Democratic president of an impeachable offense is every bit as harmful to democracy, assuming it isn’t true. Obama is the best-known and most popular Democrat in the country. The effect of attacking him isn’t just to weaken him personally, but to weaken the political opposition to Trump’s administration.

Given how great the executive’s power is, accusations by the president can’t be treated asymmetrically. If the alleged action would be impeachable if true, so must be the allegation if false. Anything else would give the president the power to distort democracy by calling his opponents criminals without ever having to prove it.

Yet on Twitter on May 17, 2017, when asked about Trump’s decision to fire Comey, Feldman was unequivocal: “Their legally novel reading of “corruptly” wouldn’t fly in court. But we agree that this is impeachable!”

Feldman is thus on record twice in 2017 claiming that Trump’s conduct was impeachable.

How does Feldman’s clear and unambiguous language square with his testimony today that, “Until this call on July 25th [2019], I was an impeachment skeptic.”

Feldman’s testimony shows that this entire process is dishonest and without any respect for the rule of law.

The lawyer for the so-called whistleblower posted this shocking admission on Twitter about the nature of some members of the intelligence community:

Many doubted the authenticity of the Tweet when sent a screen shot. As of press time, the Tweet remains up:

I've gotten clearances for guys who had child porn issues

— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) February 11, 2018

The post by Mark S. Zaid is troubling for a number of reasons, including that Zaid thought it worth bragging about.

Despite the obvious criminality of accessing such images, a proclivity for pedophilia also makes someone an easy blackmail target. No one who is attracted to minors should hold a job for both moral and national security reasons.

Yet Zaid admitted that members of the intelligence community are interested in s-xual relations with minors, and that these proclivities are no bar to obtaining access to classified information.

One member of Congress, when alerted to this Tweet, responded to this reporter, “We are sending this to the Boss, and we will be looking into it.”

It will be possible to identify these members of the intelligence community by cross-referencing their names with their lawyers. In that regard, Zaid’s brag may have breached duties owed to clients. He gave enough information to for an internal team to identify how it’s possible for people with “child p-rn issues” to obtain access to state secrets.

“The Expendables was so manly I f-cked the shit out of the little pussy boy next to me! The boys ARE back in town,” James Gunn tweeted, and he said much worse.

Gunn had no shortage of conservatives rushing to defend him aggressively:

• Ben Shapiro – Not a fan of James Gunn, but I also think that firing him for vile old joke tweets is bad precedent and a mistake. There is no limiting principle to the outrage mob.
• David French – No. This is wrong. His old tweets were 100 percent offensive and gross, but this is not how we judge people. This is not how we determine the fate of a person’s career.

Yesterday social media icon Paul Joseph Watson was banned from Facebook, and neither Shapiro nor French could muster a defense.

Of Watson, Shapiro said:

• Facebook’s conflation of “violence” and “hate” in its statement regarding the bans on Jones, Watson, Yiannopoulos and Farrakhan, among others, is a problem.

That seems a tepid, doesn’t it?

When speaking of Gunn Shapiro was must more assertive:

• I think @JamesGunn is an a**hole, as my exchange with him earlier this week made clear. I also think that firing him for vile old joke tweets is bad precedent and a mistake. There is no limiting principle to the outrage mob.

Why was Paul Joseph Watson banned from a social media monopoly? No one knows, and there’s no evidence that Watson violated any social media rule or even norm. He was downright civil and British.

Yet while Shapiro is outraged by outrage at James Gunn, he’s much more chill about a social media ban, which is a problem for several reasons.

One, Facebook is a monopoly. Disney isn’t. James Gunn was temporarily fired from one job. He found another job at another studio. There is no competitor to Facebook. Someone banned from Facebook can’t simply go elsewhere.

Two, James Gunn “confessed” or “joked” about pedophilia. Watson did….nothing. At best James Gunn thought pedophilia was a funny subject. At worse he confessed to crimes. What did Watson even do?

Three, James Gunn had a years’ long pattern of pedophile Tweets, and he deleted over 10,000 tweets and his blog once I began investigating him.

In one blog post Gunn recounted how he watched a monkey masturbate on a child. He said that beastiality involving a child “might be sick,” but “makes me extremely happy.” (Blog post archive here.)

Four, James Gunn hosted pedophile-theme parties.

This picture seems too creepy to be real, but it’s authentic.

In no world do you defend James Gunn and not Paul Joseph Watson.

James Gunn is a “use test” for internet censorship.

How do you defend his free speech rights (setting aside that the entire mainstream media rushed to white knight for him) while demanding that others be censored?

Read the rest of James Gunns’ Tweets here.

If you’re going to stand with James Gunn under free speech principles, good for you!

If you defend James Gunn while hiding when Watson and others face far greater censorship, questions are going to be asked about your motivates.

My family continues to get death threats from a stalker, and every expert said you shouldn’t give stalkers attention. And they are right. In my case, multiple “journalists” are accessories to the stalking. Here is how it works.

I filed a cease-and-desit order against my stalkers, and there’s an active criminal investigation open. The stalkers then send “news tips” to members of the fake news media. Often others are their friends.

Will Sommer of The Daily Beast asked people to send him a sex tape of me (there isn’t one). My lawyer sent a cease-and-desit letter to The Hill, where Sommer worked at the time. Brian Stelter was sent a copy of this letter, and of course he won’t ask Sommer (a guest on his program) why he’s calling people to ask for Cernovich d-ck pics.

Sommer also posted a fake news article claiming there was a sex tape. He took it down after his editor at The Hill intervened. Now Sommer works as a media critic at The Daily Beast.

Every week I get a call from a journalist asking about a “tip.” When I show them the screen caps and police reports, do they report on how my family is being stalked and harassed? No. They ignore the death threats.

Here is the latest,
and anyone reading this is going to get
“mass shooter vibes” about whoever wrote it.

Again, NEVER give attention to your stalkers. I have no choice, as their friends in the media are helping them harass my family.

This was sent to dozens of journalists. Not one of them has the integrity to report the truth.

sources close to shauna cernovich are saying that shauna has left an ‘if anything happens to me and the baby mike is responsible’ document with her lawyer.

apparently mikes reckless irresponsible behaviour, ie. posting the baby photos online, having the baby co-host his periscopes, all for the sake of bumping up his twitter stats and satisfying his pathological egocentricity is starting to wear very, very thin on shauna.

shauna is starting to suspect she may have another christopher coleman or scott peterson on her hands in mike and is deeply troubled and concerned for her own safety and that of the baby.

the death threats to the family, once again precipitated by mikes selfish thoughtless narcissistic behaviour online are especially disconcerting to shauna who has pleaded with mike to cease and desist from engaging in the what to normal people is clearly obvious, extremely dangerous perilous behaviour.

shauna has tried on countless occasions to reason with mike, to no avail that he is the culprit, cause and source of the security threat to the family and not the victim as he constantly portrays himself in tweets to his gullible followers.

mike has even made the comment that he wished shauna had a block and mute button he could press, like there is on his twitter account, so he can shut her up.

shauna is also very deeply worried and concerned that if she walks out on mike, robbing him of the opportunity to bump his twitter stats with happy family photo’s and video there might be a double homicide, namely, her and the baby.

throw into the mix mike experimenting with gorilla dust, potent hallucinogens, his delusions of grandeur that he has become a household name and is altering the course of human history, his fixation with kanye west and belief that he is about to psychologically transcend the ‘simulation’, all of which he proudly publishes many times a day on twitter, has shauna firmly convinced that mike ticks all the boxes for qualification as a full blown sociopath/psychopath.

around the house mike pays more attention to his phone than his family. shauna says the only time mike ever shows any interest in them is to produce more content for ‘click-bait’ and twitter stat bumping purposes. other than that he spends every waking moment in an obsessive compulsive infantile attention seeking frenzy tweeting on average 6-700 times per day, seven days a week.

shauna cites 3 key events she believes have led to mikes rapid downward spiral:

1) that the president hasn’t invited him to the oval office and appointed him as the white house communications director.

2) the dismissal of his idol anthony scaramucci from the white house.

3) having the listing and link to his blog removed from the drudge report.

last but not least there’s the issue of shauna’s deep suspicion that mike is engaging in an extra-marital affair, in much the same manner he openly, brazenly publicly bragged about engaging in while still married to his former wife, whilst he’s away from the home travelling to his mindset seminars and night of freedom events.

mikes cheating has become a volatile source of domestic conflict and further reason for shauna leaving the document with her lawyer and secretly wanting out of the relationship, especially over the past few days. a few incidents of note contributing to the evaporation of shauna’s trust in mikes marital fidelity include:

1) mikes recent surge in tweets to the effect “we’ve all made mistakes/done stupid things in the past” in an apparent attempt to hose down a scandal before it goes viral

2) a recent surge in mike retweeting laura loomer who, coincidentally, also seems to be having a surge of tweets saying more or less the same thing as point 1 above, ie. “we’ve all made mistakes/done stupid things in the past”.

3) mike being approached by mainstream media wanting a statement in regard to a sex-tape of him and laura loomer

4) mike documenting his melt downs in response to those MSM journalist requests for the sex-tape profusely on twitter but oddly NOT denying the existence of the tapes

5) rumours finding their way back to shauna from a variety of dependable sources that mike is funding laura loomers lavish lifestyle including rent, travel, dining, clothing, jewellery and entertainment expenses

6) mike mysteriously adopting the habit of buying something on his credit card every hour in order to document and establish his whereabouts and movements at any given point in time and admitting this activity to his twitter followers on the pretext of wanting to thwart ‘stalkers’

7) the introduction of a family ritual mike affectionately refers to as ‘map night’. map night takes place the day mikes monthly credit card statement arrives. what happens on ‘map night’ is mike makes shauna sit down with him in front of the computer and pulls up both his credit card statement and google maps on the screen.

mike then proceeds to reconcile and plot each item on the credit card statement (each of his hourly purchases mentioned in point 6 above) with the location of its place of purchase on the map.

shauna has mentioned to friends and relatives that ‘map night’ was eerily reminiscent of scott petersons conduct when police questioned him a few hours after his pregnant wife was reported missing, to quote:

‘REDWOOD CITY, California (Court TV) — Scott Peterson had proof of his alibi close at hand when police questioned him a few hours after his pregnant wife was reported missing, an investigator testified Tuesday.

Modesto police detective Jon Evers told jurors that, when he asked him about a fishing trip to the San Francisco Bay, Peterson immediately produced corroboration of his story.

“I had a quick conversation with Scott about where he went fishing, Berkeley Marina. And he said, ‘In fact, I have a parking receipt. Would you like to see it?'” Evers said.

The receipt showed Peterson parked at the launch at 12:54 p.m. on December 24, 2002, the day his wife, Laci, vanished. ‘

source: http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/16/peterson.case/index.html

8) shauna inadvertently discovering on the family computer, fake twitter accounts set up by mike, whereby he was replying to tweets from his real account with death threats to his family.

shauna has mentioned to friends and family that this scheme of mikes was eerily reminiscent to that of christopher coleman, who murdered his wife and two young children in illinois, may 2009, for motives of greed, ambition and cover up of an extra marital affair, to quote:

‘Investigators allege Coleman killed his family, fearing that a divorce would cost him his high-paying job – but he needed an alibi to explain their deaths. Their final witnesses are focusing on evidence that seems to show Coleman himself faked a series of threats against his family,  leading up to the day of the murders.

A series of violent emails from a sender identified as ‘DestroyChris’ linked the threats to Coleman’s work protecting the well-known televangelist. One message said “I will kill them all while they sleep” – refering to Coleman’s family – while another, sent to Meyer’s son and ministry CEO Chris said to “tell Chris his family is dead” because he was safeguarding Meyer.

But Ken Wojtowicz, a Granite City police officer and Major Case Squad member who specializes in computer investigations, testified that by tracing temporary IP addresses, he was able to determine that the ‘DestroyChris@gmail.com’ account was created on Coleman’s own computer and that threatening emails sent on November 14th-16th of 2008 were also sent through that computer.’

source: https://stlouis.cbslocal.com/2011/05/03/kill-them-all-emails-sent-from-colemans-own-computer/

in mikes case shauna believes the trigger for her and the babys murder might be the blow to mikes pathological egocentricity in losing twitter followers if her and the baby walk out on him and he can’t bump his stats with ‘happy family’ click-bait any longer as well as covering up his affair with laura loomer.

particularly worrisome to shauna of late though, has been mikes habit of tweeting to his followers before opening up an ‘ask me anything’ session that shauna, much like scott petersons story of his last known sighting of laci, has gone for a walk with the dog.

those close to shauna relate she is especially freaked out about the discovery of the fake ‘death threat’ twitter accounts mike set up.

To top it all off, Mike being listed on the ADL, SPLA and Media Matters for America websites as an alt-right, hate mongering, white supremacist, smear campaign organizing, fake news producing twitter troll hasn’t helped create the dream mike promised shauna before they were married.

in fact shauna has expressed in private that she now feels she’s living in a mentally abusive nightmare she can’t see any escape for her or the baby from being married to mike.

No one understands the power of breathing like someone with asthma. As a kid my asthma was bad enough that running around the block was impossible. In Army Basic Training I could barely pass the 2-mile run for the PT test. I still have minor asthma as an adult.

I learned the power of breathing on an Army base (Ft. Gordon, Georgia).

I had a fight coming up and hit the track for some road work. After finishing a difficult interval run, I felt my pulse pounding in my ears, my gums ached, and I couldn’t catch my breath.

It occurred to me, “Our breath isn’t something we control. We work ourselves hard and whatever happens, happens.” Slowly I regained control of my breath.

My asthma was never fully cured. As a runner at my physical peak, my top 5-mile run time was 35 minutes. That was while training hard, and my 2-mile PT time for the Army was never better than 12:30.

But my cardio was good enough to train boxing and even win.

There was never a good course on breathing – until now.
Wim Hof’s Breathing Course is well worth the price.

Like most of you, I learned about Wim Hof from the Joe Rogan podcast. During the Joe Rogan Podcast, Wim Hof led Joe through a breathing exercise that had Joe able to hold his breath for two minutes and thirty seconds. (Read: The Animal Within.)

My own Gorilla Mindset breathing techniques are effective to improve your focus and intensity, but Hof’s method is systematic and detailed. I’ve been following it by the book for the past six weeks.

There’s more to Wim Hof’s breathing technique than breath alone.

His full course is based on breathing, cold therapy, commitment, and physical exercise.

While breathing is the based of the method, you’ll be introduced to cold showers, contrast showers, and cold baths. Hof also teaches you how to exercise while holding your breath and performing various stretches.

Commitment is important, as you must trust the process for it to work. Perform the exercises without judgment. Witness the process. Focus on your breathing.

And oh wow, the method works.

The Wim Hof Breathing Method explained.

I’m not going to give away Hof’s course, as that would be theft. That said, Hof has made some of his material public, and that’s fair to share.

Perform 3 sets of 30-40 reps.

You start by taking in 30-40 deep breaths. You go fully in, as deeply as possible, for one breath. You then exhale. You “let go” of the breath rather than forcefully expel oxygen from your lungs.

On the final breath (or rep) of your set, you exhale. Then hold your breath.

Keep a stop watch handy.

Once you need oxygen (Wim Hof stresses that you should not try to go too hard, relax, enjoy the process), take one deep breath in. Hold that breath for 10-15 seconds.

Immediately begin another set.

Wim Hof breathing method summary:

• 3 sets of 30-40 breaths
• After exhaling on the last breath, hold your breath for as long as you can (time it with a stop watch)
• When you need oxygen, take on a deep breath. Hold that for 10-15 seconds.
• Begin your second set.
• Once you get more advanced, you’ll perform some exercises with your breath held.

“Fully in. Let go.”

During the course, you find yourself repeating Hof’s mantras. He emphasizes that your breathing exercises should not be forced. “Fully in, let go.”

Do not force the breathing exercises. Focus on the process. It is not a competition.

After mastering the breathing exercises, Hof has you perform some yoga stretches.

Later in the course you introduce cold water training.

You’ll also learn how to generate more power in your body by doing push-ups while holding your breath.

How I’ve been doing cold water training while using Wim Hof breathing.

Cold water therapy and contrast showers are part of the Wim Hof method. As I’ve been doing contrast showers for over a year, I skipped ahead a bit.

I have access to a cold water and warm water pool. The cold water pool is at 19 to 21 degrees and the warm water pool is at 30 degrees. Depending on ambient air temperature, the cold water pool gives me shivers and goose bumps when not focused on my breathing.

Using contrast therapy/Wim Hof breathing:

I perform the Wim Hof breathing method twice a day.

Here’s my schedule for each session:

• Jump into cool water pool. Do not do the breathing technique. Just get cold.
• Jump into the warm water pool. Feel the capillaries dilate as blood rushes to the surface of your skin.
• Repeat the process 3-5 times.

After the warm-up, I hop into the cold water.

I perform 4 sets of Wim Hof breating exercises.

On the final set, I hold my breath (do not exhale) and swim a lap in the cold water. I started off only able to make it one-half the length of the pool. Today I was able to make it the full length.

• Warning: Do not do this. That’s dangerous. The life guards keep a close eye on me as they think I’m a weirdo who performs abundance posture exercises in cold water as the sun sets in the infinity pool.

The contrast therapy boosts your lymphatic system. Today I almost threw up, as the cold water/hot water got lymph fluid moving.

The Wim Hoff Course is a professional product, and it’s what I’ll model a Gorilla Mindset video course after.

Wim Hof’s course is a full, 10-week course with a workbook, numerous videos, and articles from scientific journals explaining why the Wim Hof method works.

Week 1 provides you a workbook, access to numerous videos and articles, and a full introduction to the Wim Hof breathing method.

I commit a full 30 minutes to my breathing exercises, and I do this twice daily.

You could start off with four minutes a day, as Hof has an abridged video for the time crunched. (There is 10 minute and a 4 minute exercise video.)

The Wim Hof course is the best money I spent all year.

I highly recommend it.

You can buy it here.

P.S. Do not ask me any specific questions about the Wim Hof method.

I can explain to you how I modified it to suit my lifestyle and strengths.

For example, I do 10 “Wim Hof breaths” when lifting. The amount of lactic acid in the body decreases, and muscular failure is more “neurological” than “lactic.”

But giving away the information or full program would be theft.

Also, if you buy the course, you can also join a private Facebook to ask your questions.

Yes, it’s a relatively costly course, but Wim’s mission is important, and he’s a great human being.

• The course is here.