Connect with us

Culture

“I was Just Doing Research,” Accused Pedophile Journalist Goes On Trial

Published

on

Journalist Peter Bright of Ars Technica faces trial for soliciting sex with a minor, and his proposed defense is what you’d expect:

Mr. Bright informed the arresting agents that at some point in his communication with the undercover, he began to suspect that she was speaking about actual children. It was then that his focus changed to gathering information against the “Mother” to later provide to the police.

Why journalist Peter Bright waited until he was arrested for trying to have sex with a minor before informing the police of his pure motives is a question the jury will answer on February 10th in the Southern District of New York.

Police also uncovered some disturbing chats between Bright and a friend of his. These chats included conversations involving Bright’s sexual attraction to minors as young as 13 years of age.

Bright: I dream of a world in which sexy 16 year olds line up to let me have sex with them

Friend: lol

Bright: gotta say, my dream sounds more exciting than yours :p

Friend:: I can’t say I’ve seen that many 16yr old that really made me hard. I feel like 20 is about the sweet spot.

Bright: someone who friended me on facebook (I have no idea) posted a picture of his daughter, I’m guessing she’s like 13 or something

Bright: it’s all I can do to not post “I’d hit it”

Bright then uploaded the image of the girl (which I am not posting for the privacy of a victim), and then wrote: “she looks ripe enough,” and concluding with: “I mean, I’m not saying it’d be legal.”

Peter Brights trial is scheduled for February 10th in the Southern District of New York.

Post Script: Peter Bright’s articles remain posted on Ars Technica, where the articles collective revenue.

Ars Technica is a Condé Nast Publication.

Comments

Culture

CNN’s Brian Stelter Apologizes for Mistake (Good Man)

Published

on

UPDATE:

CNN’s Brian Stelter falsely accused a woman of spreading disinformation tonight, in a Tweet Stelte deleted without apology after it was revealed that Stelter lying.

The lie concerned a fire started by rioters in Washington D.C. Katrina B. Haydon reported that St. John’s church near the White House was on fire.

 

 

 

Stelter attacked the woman, baselessly accusing her of lying.

 

Brian Stelter has yet to apologize to spreading disinformation.

Did Brian Stelter lie to protect violent protesters?

Why did Stelter lie?

Is he trying to provide propaganda for violent protesters and domestic terrorists?

Continue Reading

Culture

“Burn It Down,” ESPN Writer Encourages Arson of Low Income Housing

Published

on

ESPN sportswriter Chris Palmer Martin Tweeted, “Burn that shit down. Burn it all down.” The burning building was a low-income housing area in Minneapolis. (Minneapolis vandalism targets include 189-unit affordable housing development.)

When rioters neared Martin’s home, he called them “animals.”

 

The media has a history of supporting ANTIFA.

 

 

Hoaxed Movie Uncovers the Media’s Relationship with ANTIFA

Watch the Hoaxed Movie Trailer

Where to Watch Hoaxed Movie

iTunes here

Vimeo here

YouTube here

VuDu here

DVDs here

Continue Reading

Culture

Trump Channels CNN in Joe Scarborough “Cold Case”

Published

on

“It’s possible, but I don’t know.” With those words former FBI Director James Comey set a new standard for media coverage of public figures. Even when there is no evidence to substantiate your claim, even when you’re relying on a document that had been discredited within the FBI, even when you’re quoting work product that was the result of Russian disinformation, you give no quarter to your enemies.

I am referencing the infamous pee-pee interview James Comey gave to ABC. Comey’s words were amplified by every media outlet. No context was added (such as the FBI’s knowing the Steele dossier was funded by Democrats and contained hoaxes from Russian pranksters).

And now Trump is applying these same principles to Joe Scarborough.

Media figures cry foul. What moral authority do they have?

Scarborough’s own colleague Rachel Maddow accuses people of being Russian assets. When called to answer those allegations in court, she claims that her assertions, believed to be statements of fact by her millions of viewers, are “quintessential statements of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false.”

As much as I’m glad to see Joe Scarborough be treated with the same “journalistic ethics” as he treats others, I feel for the Lori Klausutis family, who no doubt do not want these painful memories resurfaced. Scarborough deserves this, but the Klausutis family does not.

But as always the media is treating itself as the real victim here.

The same media figures who recklessly smeared innocent teenagers from Covington High School as racists have much to say about a need for others to measure their words.

The same media figures who obsess over every mean Tweet a conservative posts ignores Scarborough’s on-air recording joking about the tragic death of a staffer.

Feel some empathy for the Klausutis. They are caught in a battle they didn’t start.

Scarborough, however, is getting exactly what he and everyone else on cable news deserves.

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending

shares
Read previous post:
Racism and Pedophile “Jokes” – A BuzzFeed Reporter’s History of Vile Tweets

"Every movie should open with a scene where a child watches Rob Lowe have sex," BuzzFeed reporter Ryan Broderick posted...

Close