UPDATE:

Update: Brian Stelter has apologized.

This was a full and unequivocal apology, and all of us should applaud it and remember it when our time to own up to mistakes arises.

(Because that day is coming for all of us, sooner or later.) pic.twitter.com/QWtBLDsK4s

— Essential Cernovich (@Cernovich) June 1, 2020

CNN’s Brian Stelter falsely accused a woman of spreading disinformation tonight, in a Tweet Stelte deleted without apology after it was revealed that Stelter lying.

The lie concerned a fire started by rioters in Washington D.C. Katrina B. Haydon reported that St. John’s church near the White House was on fire.

Box Alarm 1525 H St NW. #DCsBravest had fire in basement of church. Fire extinguishing. Checking for extension.

— DC Fire and EMS #StayHomeDC Lite (@dcfireems) June 1, 2020

NEW: Fire was in basement of St. Johns, and is out, my @washingtonpost colleague @phscoop reports from DC fire department. Firefighters got there w/ a police escort and quickly put out the blaze. Did NOT appear to cause any significant damage, and it is unclear how it started.

— Michelle Boorstein (@mboorstein) June 1, 2020

Stelter attacked the woman, baselessly accusing her of lying.

Brian Stelter has yet to apologize to spreading disinformation.

Shannon Bream and live video feed on Fox

— Katrina B Haydon (@katrinabhaydon) June 1, 2020

He called you a liar and then deleted it. Amazing.

— Jarvis (@jarvis_best) June 1, 2020

It looks like @brianstelter deleted this tweet. https://t.co/kpB0asax5d

— Derek Hunter (@derekahunter) June 1, 2020

Accuses me of either lying or being too dumb to communicate what I’m seeing on live TV, then deletes it pic.twitter.com/A8tCQ5JOdT

— Katrina B Haydon (@katrinabhaydon) June 1, 2020

Did Brian Stelter lie to protect violent protesters?

Why did Stelter lie?

Is he trying to provide propaganda for violent protesters and domestic terrorists?

This is a shot of the footage that Fox took of the fire in the St. John’s basement – DC fire is now on the scene https://t.co/LD1zpCekGO pic.twitter.com/H7Vr5pHZJq

— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) June 1, 2020

ESPN sportswriter Chris Palmer Martin Tweeted, “Burn that shit down. Burn it all down.” The burning building was a low-income housing area in Minneapolis. (Minneapolis vandalism targets include 189-unit affordable housing development.)

When rioters neared Martin’s home, he called them “animals.”

Oops pic.twitter.com/cUAYD5BIYj

— Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) May 31, 2020

The media has a history of supporting ANTIFA.

CNN in 2017: Antifa opposes hate and seek peace through violence

Antifa in 2020: Burns down CNN@Cernovich @jondutoit pic.twitter.com/vj8hfaGdgx

— Scooter Downey (@TrueLegendFilms) May 30, 2020

Media bro’s went from ANTIFA is good to ANTIFA doesn’t exist https://t.co/XWormC5xNE

— Essential Cernovich (@Cernovich) May 31, 2020

Hoaxed Movie Uncovers the Media’s Relationship with ANTIFA

Watch the Hoaxed Movie Trailer

Where to Watch Hoaxed Movie

iTunes here

Vimeo here

YouTube here

VuDu here

DVDs here

“It’s possible, but I don’t know.” With those words former FBI Director James Comey set a new standard for media coverage of public figures. Even when there is no evidence to substantiate your claim, even when you’re relying on a document that had been discredited within the FBI, even when you’re quoting work product that was the result of Russian disinformation, you give no quarter to your enemies.

I am referencing the infamous pee-pee interview James Comey gave to ABC. Comey’s words were amplified by every media outlet. No context was added (such as the FBI’s knowing the Steele dossier was funded by Democrats and contained hoaxes from Russian pranksters).

"I honestly never thought these words would come out of my mouth, but I don’t know whether a current host of a major MSNBC show killed a staffer. It’s possible, but I don’t know."

How is that *any* different from this stuff CNN and media did for 3 years? https://t.co/UtFxbLDx8P

— Essential Cernovich (@Cernovich) May 27, 2020

And now Trump is applying these same principles to Joe Scarborough.

Media figures cry foul. What moral authority do they have?

Scarborough’s own colleague Rachel Maddow accuses people of being Russian assets. When called to answer those allegations in court, she claims that her assertions, believed to be statements of fact by her millions of viewers, are “quintessential statements of rhetorical hyperbole, incapable of being proved true or false.”

As much as I’m glad to see Joe Scarborough be treated with the same “journalistic ethics” as he treats others, I feel for the Lori Klausutis family, who no doubt do not want these painful memories resurfaced. Scarborough deserves this, but the Klausutis family does not.

But as always the media is treating itself as the real victim here.

The same media figures who recklessly smeared innocent teenagers from Covington High School as racists have much to say about a need for others to measure their words.

The same media figures who obsess over every mean Tweet a conservative posts ignores Scarborough’s on-air recording joking about the tragic death of a staffer.

Feel some empathy for the Klausutis. They are caught in a battle they didn’t start.

Scarborough, however, is getting exactly what he and everyone else on cable news deserves.

Whoa! Did Joe Scarborough really say this? https://t.co/jXz58vz3zn

— Essential Cernovich (@Cernovich) May 27, 2020