Bloomberg: Antifa Has More In Common With Nazis Than American Ideals - Mike Cernovich
Connect with us

News

Bloomberg: Antifa Has More In Common With Nazis Than American Ideals

Published

on

Advertisement

In a new Bloomberg View article, the arguably left-leaning columnist Eli Lake slams Antifa as having “more in common with the Tiki-torch Nazis than with American ideals.”

“As America feels like it’s coming apart at the seams, I have a modest proposal,” writes Lake – who has also authored such titles as “Love Loses With Trump’s Trans Military Ban” and slammed President Trump’s decision to pardon Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

“The hard-right and hard-left activists who so enjoy protesting one another should meet every few weekends in a large national park and have at it.”

“After all,” he continues, “this is not a fight for the soul of America. Neither the Tiki-torch Nazis nor the masked anarchists represent a viable American future. They are simply engaging in nostalgia, a scarier version of Civil War battle re-enactments.”

Lake goes on to slam the left’s depiction of Antifa’s actions in Charlottesville as equivalent to that of “the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy.”

“Not quite the most  apt historical parallel. Zoom back to between the world wars. Most of the people who fought the fascists in Europe’s streets were themselves radical leftists. Both extremes helped to weaken already weak governments in Germany, Italy and Spain.”

“Antifa has become the violent vanguard of the censorious progressive ‘safe space’ movement, in which ideas and speakers deemed offensive are equated with physical violence,” Lake continues, pointing to the ridiculous outcry that went up in response to speeches in Berkeley by Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter.

“Now whatever one wants to say about those two, they are not Nazis. Indeed, the hysterical reaction to their appearances proves a point Yiannopoulos often makes, that political correctness on campus is a great menace to the principle of free speech.”

Eli Lake is but the latest on the left and in the mainstream media to condemn Antifa’s violence while RINOs like Paul Ryan and John McCain stay supportive of the alt-left.

Even Nancy Pelosi disavowed Antifa’s violent tactics yesterday, stating, “the violent actions of people calling themselves antifa in Berkeley this weekend deserve unequivocal condemnation, and the perpetrators should be arrested and prosecuted.”

Earlier today, Marc A. Thiessen writing for The Washington Post also condemned Antifa, stating they are “the moral equivalent of neo-Nazis.”

Here’s what the RINOs last said about Antifa in response to President Donald Trump’s condemnation of the alt-left.

How is it that the mainstream media and Democrats like Nancy Pelosi have more courage than the likes of Paul Ryan, who claims to represent the citizens Antifa brutally attacks?

Sources:
The Washington Post
Bloomberg View

Comments

Featured

BREAKING: Man Arrested After Travelling To White House To “Kill All White Cops”

Published

on

The Secret Service has reportedly arrested a man believed to have travelled to the White House from Dallas, Texas intending to “kill all white police” at the Presidential residence.

According to screenshots shared by leading journalist Mike Cernovich, the man made his vow via Facebook.

He also apparently used to app to “check in” at the White House earlier today.

The Washington Times, meanwhile, quotes a Secret Service statement as informing the public that they had been on the lookout for Michael Arega after receiving a warning from the Montgomery County, Maryland police department.

Arega was reportedly promptly detained in Washington, D.C. without incident.

Arega’s Facebook profile currently lists him as a Quality Control Inspector at Alpha Testing, Inc.

Also shared to Arega’s profile is a post from a page called “Unapologetically Black” that features the late Fidel Castro posing with brutal dictator Robert Mugabe.

Another post provides a possible look at Arega himself.

This is a developing story. Please stay tuned to Cernovich.com for more details.

Continue Reading

Media

Vice, Newsweek Silent After Journalist Accused Of Robbing, Injuring A Woman At Cernovich Event

Published

on

Vice, Newsweek and The Guardian remain silent after a journalist claiming to work for the media outlets was accused of robbing a woman and injuring her in the process outside Mike Cernovich’s Columbia University event in New York on Monday evening.

As New York Daily News reports, police arrested 30-year-old Arvind Dilawar – who now faces robbery and possession of stolen property charges – outside the event after he allegedly ripped a cellphone out of a 34-year-old woman’s hands and ran off.

As Mike Cernovich reported earlier today via Twitter, that woman is believed to be a journalist who was covering the protest outside Mike Cernovich’s event.

As of earlier this afternoon, Dilawar’s website – which is currently password protected – lists him as a writer for The Guardian, Vice and Newsweek.

Those outlets have not responded to requests for comment from Cernovich Media related to the incident.

Specifically, Cernovich Media wanted to know how those outlets were handling the serious allegations aimed at Dilawar. The writer himself has also not responded to a request from Cernovich Media for comment.

The circumstances surrounding Dilawar’s alleged theft remain unclear but an account from at least one other journalist covering last night’s protest outside Columbia University indicates that alt-leftists were less than welcoming towards journalists.

The hostility appears to have been rooted in a fear of having their faces exposed to the public – probably not an unfounded fear considering the infamous tale of one Eric Clanton.

Despite attempts by the alt-left to disrupt Mike Cernovich’s event at Columbia yesterday, the Gorilla Mindset author’s speech went more or less smoothly. Catch the full speech below.

 

Continue Reading

Featured

Trump Agrees To Release Hidden JFK Files: MSM Was Wrong Again.

Published

on

I have a question. Are the American people entitled to a more transparent version of history? After all, historical events play a massive roll in establishing future political outcomes, sentiment, and direction. So by that accord wouldn’t more information be better than less, in regards to making more informed decisions? Are the American people entitled to know the truth when it comes to their own country’s history?

This question is certainly applicable to the current political questions being raised about the release of a potential trove of government documents on the JFK assassination. Will we be left with more questions than answers regarding the events that took place on that fateful day in Dallas on November 22nd, 1963? Well, Trump set the speculation to rest when he posted this tweet earlier today.

The MSM’s spin on the topic has been quite visible. Articles filled with wild speculations and anti-Trump rhetoric began circulating around the web. Some saying that if President Trump agreed to let the files become public that pandemonium would ensue. Other articles claiming that it would refuel “conspiracy theorists.”

According to Newsweek, “More than 3,000 never-before-seen documents from the FBI, CIA, and Justice Department are set to be released, along with 30,000 that have only been partially released in the past.

The document dump “will simply fuel a new generation of conspiracy theories,” write Philip Shenon and Larry J. Sabato.” Newsweek continued, “The Archives will release the documents between now and the Oct. 26 deadline, but doing so could be chaotic.”

One wildly popular media personality seemed to call Trump’s decision before it had been formally announced. Alex Jones of Infowars.com was ont of the few to seem confident about the release of the documents as was evident in this tweet.

Politico reported, “Trump, no stranger to conspiracy theories, including totally unsubstantiated theories about a link between Ted Cruz’s father and JFK’s death.” They continued, “s it stands now, the document release this month will be a logistical nightmare, with the public suddenly flooded with a huge online library of documents—tens of thousands in total—that will be, at first, mostly incomprehensible even to experienced students of the assassination.”

Politico also writes, “With everything made public at once, pandemonium is all but guaranteed, since major news organizations around the world will want to know, almost instantly, what is in the documents that is new and potentially important. And there will simply be no way for historians and other researchers, even those with a special knowledge of the Kennedy assassination, to make any authoritative judgment as they try to page through tens of thousands of pages of files all at once.”

So amid the debate on whether or not these documents should be released, we have to ask ourselves, who benefits? Why does the MSM seem to be so slanted on this topic? Would the American people benefit from learning the truth about the JFK assassination? Is the truth something that unites the American people? Draw your own conclusion but I am of the opinion that not only are we owed the truth, we deserve it.

Sources:
Politico
Newsweek

Continue Reading

Support Our Team!

BUY YOUR COPY NOW!

Title

Trending